Thursday, November 1, 2012

"Who ate all the Pecan Sandys?" Hurricane Help

I have a friend named Catherine Boyd. She lives in Ventnor City, NJ. She plays the violin like a champ. She managed to go out inland just in time before Hurricane Sandy hit. Her and her husband, an artist, are safe. Her cat is happy. She can't go back to her house yet, the sewage system is on overload and 8 feet of water flooded the street around the corner from where she lives.  Here's part of the email she sent me:

"Truth is, I've been unable to go to sleep every night. I'm worried sick about my husband's artwork in our garage and in his store on Ocean City (which we just found out got 2 feet of water). We're not allowed to go and check on anything yet, we're not allowed to go back on these islands for whatever reason (looting, potential poops in the street, we're tenants in the store and the owners are letting insurance adjusters in first instead of us). It takes mold only 12 hours to take root. On top of the raw sewage and toxic chemicals, oh God I'm crying again. We may have lost 200K of artwork. I pray that it's less. Not knowing is making us crazy.
I'm worried sick about mold growing on my husband's artwork. I cry when I think of the food spoiling in our fridge. It's not like we're super wealthy people here. We're supposed to stay with a friend tonight, who lives about 20 minutes away from our place. There's a tree across his driveway, so thank God my instinct was to take shelter far inland."

I was supposed to go to Philly this weekend by train. Amtrak is closed because of the intense damages and disruptions caused by the storm. I was annoyed and angry. But here I am, pissed that my weekend plans are ruined, and there's a woman who can't get back to her home because there's literal shit in the streets.

I'm taking my refund money that I get from Amtrak and donating it to the Red Cross.

I'm not trying to be preachy or holier-than-thou because I kinda needed to be preached too. I'm not really the person who floods News Feeds with pictures of starving African children and all those other important social and humanitarian issues. But it takes that one personal story for it to hit you. Yes, I can tweet "my prayers and thoughts go out to the victims" and all that. Which is a nice sentiment. It's a nice, simple thing to send your thoughts/prayers/good vibes/etc and I'm just a spiritual enough person to believe that it has to have some sort of effect. But it's not the least someone can do. It's, like, less than the least I can do. That doesn't make sense, but it does to me. I'm not poo-pooing on people who made things like that their statuses, nor am I poo-pooing on the people who were celebrating not having school or complaining about no power. Or the people making Gifs and memes of the hurricane with Sandy Cheeks superimposed (those were funny). Make those jokes, celebrate not having school, send out your prayers and thoughts. But you can do more. Most usually, "doing more" in a situation like this means giving money to somebody. And we can all definitely afford even $5 or something.

Again, not trying to be preachy, I hope I don't come off that way. What I'm saying is do something. Even if that means giving some money. It can also mean volunteering. Or going to your neighbors house and helping pick up some branches that fell or something. Just do something. Volunteer. Donate. Or don't, I'm not your boss.

Red Cross:
http://www.redcross.org/charitable-donations

Direct Relief International
http://www.directrelief.org/donate/

PS. NBC is doing a big benefit concert on NBC this Friday, 8-9pm, with money going to the Red Cross to help New Jersey residents affected by Sandy. Bruce, Bon Jovi, Billy Joel, et al are going to be on air. If you're one the Twitter, tweet about it using #RedCrossCommunity. Because **schmultzy, corny statement alert** we are all one big ass community.

PPS The title of the post is a quote by Roger from American Dad's first episode. Has nothing to do with anything besides "Sandy." 

Saturday, October 20, 2012

HOCUS POCUS Drinking Game

So Hocus Pocus is my all time favorite Halloween movie. It's one of those movies I watched as a child that just penetrated deep within my brain and created a special place there. There's something about it that I will never tire of.

Anyway, I came across a couple of Hocus Pocus drinking games. I wasn't fully satisfied with them; I didn't think they were creative enough. So I decided to make my own. Be aware I did not take into account that abiding by all these rule will probably kill you.



Take a drink every time:
- Winifred says "SISTAHS"
- Mary barks
- Sarah acts the slut (decided at your own discretion)
- Max is referred to as "Hollywood"
- Billy Butcherson loses his head
- Someone says "Sanderson Sisters"
- The Sisters are befuddled by 1993 technology (decided at your own discretion)
- Winifred uses physical violence on her sisters (I would include verbal abuse but that would lead to alcohol abuse)

Chug your drink:
- When Winnie is reciting a spell
- When Sarah is singing (chug for at least 2 lines of the song)

Take a shot when:
- Binx dies
- Somebody says "Hocus Pocus"

Girls drink:
- When Binx mentions his sister Emily
- When Dani screams 
-When Dani says Yabos

Guys drink:
- At any/all appearances of Jay/ICE
- When Sarah sees a boy and says "Lemme play with him"
- When Max looks at Allison with obvious sexual attraction

Special Rules:
- Whenever the word "Virgin" is spoken, all virgins take a drink
- Whenever Mary smells children, all under 21 (or the youngest people, make it work) take a drink

WHEN THEY SING "I PUT A SPELL ON YOU" EVERYBODY MUST DANCE, SING, OR BOTH. THERE IS NO DRINKING DURING THE SONG SO AS NOT TO DISTRACT FROM THE WONDERS OF THAT MUSICAL NUMBER.

Have fun! Don't die! And remember:







Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I Guess I Just Like Liking Things

The very recent news about NBC postponing Community's October 19th premiere has led to another expected call-to-arms from us Communies. But as we once again don our evil goatees and threaten to burn Utica and 30 Rock plaza to the ground, I've discovered another group of people reacting to it. Yes, the trolls are once again emerging from their dank under-bridge dwellings to add insult to injury.

Now, I have been very lucky in that I have very few experiences with trolls. I was only an active member of one community forum (like ten years ago, it was for the video game Golden Sun) and I never scroll down past the info section of a YouTube video. Because I don't like to deal with that. I don't like having my parade rained on, or giving in to someone who wants the satisfaction of knowing they might ruin someone's day with a needlessly hateful comment. But that changed when I became very socially conscious, got into television a lot more, and became a full-fledged Communie. I began to read as many articles as possible and started following a bunch of my fellow fans on Twitter. I began to read the comments sections of blogs and articles, looking for these same-minded people. So of course I would wind up running into those people who seek out articles on things they don't like just to say they don't like something in the rudest way they can think.

I really don't understand that at all. I don't understand why you would deliberately seek out things you hate just to tell everyone you hate it. It's so unbelievable vain. ( I mean, of course there are things we don't like, things we find sub-standard or unappealing. And that's fine. But there's something so pure and wonderful about rushing headlong into something with the uninhibited enthusiasm of a puppy. ) It's these incredibly self-obsessed people that are doing this. At least that's what I think. So unhappy and alone and desperate to be heard. Someone might post a horrible anti-Obama comment on a random video of a cartoon about a llama. But what they're really saying is LISTEN TO ME!! I WANT TO BE HEARD BUT I'M TOO IMMATURE TO DO SO IN A WAY THAT DOESN'T MAKE ME LOOK LIKE A INTOLERABLE DOUCHE!! This phrase may be incredibly dated, but talk about 'get a life.' But, with these types of trolls, I actually have sympathy for them. It's really tragic. Because, as a licensed psychology major, I can imagine how they're thinking. They are unhappy with their lives and they go on the internet and see people who are happy. It's sad, it's embarrassing, it's depressing. And this depression manifests itself in anger. And then they get to typing.

There is another type of troll, through. A type that annoys me more, because it is much harder to sympathize with this kind. The kind of people who write articles like this: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/10/lets-put-community-out-its-misery/57783/
I'll save you the trouble, this guy is rude. And he is attacking the fans of Community and the show itself. I'm perfectly okay with the fact that he doesn't like Community. He doesn't need to. But I can't stand how he talks about us Communies. What is wrong with liking something? Can anyone give me an answer to that? I know there's a wise-ass saying something like "well there's something wrong with liking to drown bunnies or liking to rape people", but I'm talking about things like a TV show, a movie franchise, an animal, a sports team, a band or singer. Because we all have different interests, different likes and dislikes, opinions, obsessions. And that's a wonderful thing. It's what makes us people, what makes us interesting. Do I really have to spell out why it's wrong to hate someone for having a different opinion than you? Jeez.

I have a friend who doesn't understand my obsession/love with Community. I'm fine with it. I'll admit, I still get a little upset when she makes jokes about it. But it's fine. I don't understand her obsession/love of her cats. I like cats. I would like to have a cat. I can't see myself being obsessed with a cat. But what I can understand is a person's natural capacity to be obsessed with something.  To love and admire something so much that you actually give out a part of yourself to and for it. It's a beautiful thing. Beautiful and admirable and awesome and honest.

So why hate on a group of people for liking something? (Once again, some wise-ass is bringing up the KKK or the Nazis) What's wrong with a community of people with a common interest? Connecting with people over common interests is just as natural as our capacity to love something/someone. Once again, I understand not liking something. It's perfectly okay to not be a fan of something, whether it's a sports team or a TV show. I'm not a fan of the Twilight movies. I've never read the books, so I can't say anything about them, but I will admit to seeing the first Twilight movie. I didn't care for it. But that doesn't mean I'm going to go find a Twilight message board somewhere and start ripping on it. That doesn't mean I'm gonna go punch some tweenage girl with an Edward Cullen shirt in the still developing ovaries. Because while their screaming admiration might be annoying, I'm not gonna let it turn me into an ass. I can't respect what they are obsessed with, but I can respect their fervid and enthusiastic loyalty to it. (The same thing goes for fandoms in sports and in music.)

I'm not trying to be all "why can't we all get along and be one big happy family." I'm saying that I'm disappointed in people, like that guy who wrote that article, that don't understand something as fundamental as the power of a community (and it is completely coincidental that the community I'm involved in is for a show called Community). Because he must be obsessed with something. At least I hope he is. I hope he's in love with the band Phish or something. And he has, like, 23 Phish shirts and a bunch of ticket stubs from concerts. Because we all have things we are obsessed with. And if he doesn't, what a sad existence that must be: to not be passionate for anything.

We all like liking things. And we all need to understand that and stop being dicks. People just need to be able to take that one extra second before hitting send on that racist comment and think "Is what I'm doing making me look like an asshole?" That's been South Park's central message for years: Just don't be an asshole.

Some of you may read this and shake your head with disagreement. Fine. How about this piece of social commentary from Futurama? "Society is never gonna make any progress until we all learn to pretend to like each other."

And, obviously, I will end this with a quote from my beloved Abed:

“The universe is an endless raging sea of randomness. Our job isn’t to fight it but to weather it together. It won’t matter what happens to us as long as we stay honest and accepting of each others'  flaws and virtues.” I think this can apply to our likes and dislikes, too.


Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Community's Future

I wrote this shortly after the announcement that Dan Harmon was fired, but never got around to finishing it and putting it up here. It might not have the same effect because emotions aren't as powerful as they were that crazy three-day period, but I still want to share it:



Been watching a bunch of season one episodes. It reminding me of something I don’t need reminding. I LOVE this show. It’s so good. And in the midst of all this sadness of harmon leaving and the producers and writers and the day change and shortened episode numbers, It’s important to think of the positives. It’s always important to thing of the positives in moments of crisis. It brings hope. Hope is laughed at and mocked and such but it’s so necessary.  People think it’s foolish to be hopeful. People think they are better, smarter, than to have to rely on hope. But I say screw you.  I could go into a whole other thing about all that, but it would stray too far away from the point. Back to the point. 

The positives. It’s not cancelled. We get a season 4. That’s more than Arrested Development got, and now they’re coming back to do another season and a movie. There’s hope right there. The new producers have worked on good/great show like Happy Endings and The IT Crowd. Hope. But the most important positive to remember is that in the fall we’ll turn on NBC on Friday and we’ll still be at Greendale. And isn’t that what we fell in love with? Greendale? The study group? We didn’t fall in love with the show because it can pull off a genre parody. Of course, it’s one of the reasons we do love the show, its ability to successfully do an epic and fantastic parody of an action movie or spaghetti western or Apollo 13 or a video game. It’s great. And it will be a hallmark of the Dan Harmon era. But the reason why those episodes are fall-in-love worthy is because they don’t forget about the characters just to get the genre right. Modern Warfare was “the episode with the paintball,” will be what everyone says first. But the second thing that should be remembered about that episode is that it’s the one where Jeff and Britta finally have sex. ON THE STUDY ROOM TABLE. (Remember. The Table. Is. Magic.) The Claymation Christmas episode is not just the one where it’s Claymation but it’s the one where we understand a bit more about Abed’s psyche (of course there are like 10 episodes about this, my favorite being Intro to Film). Epidemiology is the zombie apocalypse episode, but more importantly it’s the one where Shirley and Chang have sex in the bathroom and she GETS PREGNANT.  There are the “high concept” episodes whose primary subject is the characters before the genre parody. Cooperative Calligraphy is a bottle episode. But they use the bottle episode format to get into the characters so much deeper. Remedial Chaos Theory could’ve been some awesome adventure of crazy timelines filled with crazy events. It was awesome, of course, but it was used to take a closer look at the group dynamic to see how it would be without one specific person. We love those episodes because of THE CHARACTERS. We love the second paintball because they were fighting. Not just fighting a paintball war in a spaghetti-western-turned-Star-Wars style, but because they were fighting FOR GREENDALE. 

When season Four starts we won’t have Dan Harmon. We won’t have the Russo Bros. We won’t have Chris McKenna or Neil Goldman or Garrett.  But we will have Troy and Jeffrey, and Annie and Britta, and Shirley and Pierce, and Abed and Jeffrey. And the Dean! And we have to believe, because it is true, that Harmon created enough of a foundation in these characters and that place that it will be hard to totally mess up by people with hardly any qualifications, let alone two people who are as capable as Moses Port and David Guarascio.

I’m not saying it will be the same. I’m not saying it will be better. I’m saying it will still be a place I want to go to every Friday at 830 after I make sure I don’t see a bit of Whitney. Greendale’s where I belong. The study group is who I love. Not a movie parody.

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Occupy Selfishness

I thought I'd share my feelings/opinions about some current events. I would love it if you read it all. I know I write a lot and sometimes get carried away..

http://nhregister.com/articles/2012/06/13/news/metro/doc4fd82eab75d37784224319.txt?viewmode=fullstory

Here's just a list of some of my tweets on this subject before I get really into it:

I’m sorry but the grad speech/Occupy thing is Grade A Oscar Meyer Bologna. 

Taking the attention away from the other 300 kids graduating high school is what’s unfair.

Accusing the school of denying you the privilege of speaking at graduation bc of your political affiliations.

Not accepting the simple fact that you missed the deadline for submitting your speech.

Leaving school for three months then coming back expecting to walk and speak at graduation.

Going to the news about being oppressed when you can't abide by simple deadlines.

Being the representative of a student body then leaving for 3 months and expecting a warm welcome upon return.

Being a typical attention seeking teenage girl and blowing it to even more obnoxious proportions.

"I just never knew about the deadline,” she has difficulty getting internet where she lives." Well too damn bad, missy.

I appreciate the father's statements in this article. #OccupyAtLeastTheresOneSanePersonInvolved

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's get one thing clear. Molly is a fine person. She's smart and all that jazz. I have no problem with the Occupy movement. I have a problem with people being selfish and going to obnoxious ends to extend that selfishness. I agree with a lot she has to say in her little essay there about the educational system and all that. But none of that is the point. Anything at all Occupy related, anything she was going to say in her speech. None of it is the point. I'm not even going to take into consideration her leaving school for 3 months. Still not the point.  

The simple, pathetic truth is that there was a deadline she did not meet. Speaking at graduation is a privilege, not a right. And I don’t care if that makes me sound like a pretentious asshole, it’s true. And since she's all learning in the real world and talking with "real people" (anyone else personally offended when she slammed EVERY STUDENT at NHHS for not being “real people”? seriously, Occupy Rude And Morbid Over-generalization) you would think she would have learned to be a Big Girl. Apparently she learned to value selfishness. What is she a member of the fucking Bluth family? Back to the point. She missed the deadline. She lost the privilege. Be a Big Girl and accept it and take responsibility for your decisions. 

But she did not do that. Instead, she decides to be selfish and make this whole thing about her.  Her not knowing about the deadline is her fault. Her not having proper internet connection is no fault of the school’s. What she does is takes her neglect for the deadline and turns it around, leaping to the conclusion that she is being oppressed because of her civic involvement with the Occupy movement. What? That’s like me saying I failed my Stats exam because John Kerry flip-flops. No. I failed my Stats exam because I didn’t study. Sure, I could have blamed Mr. Jackson’s teaching “techniques.” But instead I acted like an adult and took responsibility for my actions and decisions.
I could be a little more offensive here. She can’t use the Race Card, so she’s using the Occupy Card. Welcome to the new decade, everybody.

The fact the school is letting her come back from a near three-month hiatus and graduate is a huge act of generosity and I won’t even get into any possible conspiracy theories with that. There was sure to have been some bending over backwards for that to be arranged. Yet that’s not good enough? 

My brother says she’s just being a typical teenage girl, seeking attention. That may offend some females for sure, so I’ll edit it slightly. She’s being a typical CHILD. Not getting her way and throwing a tantrum, albeit a tantrum with less shrieking and more news coverage.

I know an argument can be made for her not being selfish. The fact that she’s fighting so hard is because she wants to share her experiences blah blah blah to her peers etc, etc. I get that. Unfortunately, you missed the deadline that would allow you to present it to your classmates. Fortunately, the internet exists. Allowing you to put your speech up there on the interwebs with the added benefit of anyone anywhere in the entire world having access and being able to read about your experiences. And no I hear she will be presenting it at some Occupy thing in Philly or someplace. Good for her. More people than ever will hear it now. 

And I hope that wasn’t some elaborate heist she fathomed weeks ago. To “miss” the deadline, make a fuss, and then manage to get media attention so that more people than normally possible would be able to see it. I don’t think that’s the case, because that’s too…too much like television.

But I still haven’t gotten to my biggest upset about this whole thing. (And bear with me, I’m wrapping up soon)  It was the first thing I tweeted about. Now, I don’t know the exact number, so I will round to 300. 300 other kids. 300 other kids graduating from high school. Some may not think it a big deal, but most do. (And any of you who’ve read my Glee posts know that I think it’s a huge deal) 300 other kids graduating from high school who will now just be known as the 300 other kids who graduating with Molly Gambardella. 300 other kids who got any attention and notice taken away from them because one girl had to bring her selfishness to unreasonable (and apparently newsworthy) proportions. Okay, I’ll need to reference her involvement in the Occupy movement to further my point. She became an outspoken member of the “99%”: a group of people with a common goal, a brotherhood with a like cause. Much like many people consider their high school class to be. She’s the president of the Class of 2012. And this stunt is not being a leader for them. What is a high school class’ common goal, like cause? No, not “to graduate high school, get into college, get a good job and get money” (what Molly so effectively connects to The Matrix (see, I can compliment the girl, too)). But to grow with each other, learn from each other, coexist with each other in the same building, same town, for 4, 7, sometimes 13+ years (from pre-K to grade 12). Growing, learning, coexisting: things Molly didn’t learn to do, apparently, until she became involved in the Occupy movement.  I’m glad that she learned these things, but upset that she has been unable to see the connections with that to her high school class. Her selfish actions, though maybe derived from pure intentions, have unconsciously caused her to weaken the special bond one has with their senior class and to steal away the attention of a large group of her peers that she so unfortunately considers to not be “actual real people.”

I will be attending graduation on Thursday. I will leave any potential protesters be. I will politely clap for Molly as she receives her diploma (to what I can only assume will be a glorious mix of thunderous cheering and courageous boo-ing from the crowd). Just as I will politely clap for every student that walks across the stage, shakes Dr. Dallai’s hand, and gets their picture taken (I hope it’s not as hot as it was in 2010, where it was so hot my face was as red as my gown was maroon). Most of my focus, though, will indeed be on my cousin, Cristina Capriglione. (Here’s betting our family can create a louder response to her crossing the stage than to anyone else’s. Cowbell FTW)

And that’s all I have to say about that.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

GLEE finale: Graduation, Dreams

I enjoyed the Glee finale. I actually did. I'm a sucker for finales. I’m going to talk about why more in depth, obviously, and the reason I’ve decided to talk about Glee again is because I liked this finale for more reasons than what I said in my last post. (Of course those reasons will be mentioned again)

First, I want to say something about the songs. I don’t normally talk about the songs, because they are normally a stupid waste of time only used to sell iTunes singles, but every now and then they work for me. And since this may be the last time I talk about Glee in a positive light I might as well talk about them for a moment.  They work for me when a song is being sung and it cuts between the performance of the song and some other story. Like Blaine singing Cough Syrup to Karofsky’s suicide attempt, or Shake It Out to Beiste’s not leaving Cooter. The best example, though, will always be the Season One finale, Bohemian Rhapsody to Quinn giving birth. (Seriously. Go on Netflix. Go to Glee, Season one, episode 22. 18 minutes, 35 second in. Fantastic.) I thought Puck and Finn singing Glory Days as the graduating ceremony was happening was stupid, but it was good because it has to be viewed as them not literally performing it, but it was how they were feeling. Just like that song Rachel was singing on the train. She wasn’t actually singing it on the train; it’s just how she was feeling. And that’s the point of having a musical, to quote Abed: “they sing what they mean instead of making a face.” It’s a reason why people don’t like the genre, but that doesn’t mean it’s not useful.

Lots of the time, I really do dislike Glee. I’ve already talked about the reasons I still suffer through watching it. I may one day write about all the reasons I thinks it’s awful.  I dislike it most when it tries to be like a normal television show. With little weekly plotlines and stories about the characters that don’t come up again, just used to fill in the episode or for wherever/whatever Ryan Murphy’s ego trip takes us that week/makes the characters. Like Artie being interested in directing, or Blaine’s relationship with his brother. I mean, some of them are average, run-of-the-mill TV fodder, but Glee isn’t really successful when it tries to tell any specific character stories. It is successful when it tells larger, universal/archetypal ones. Glee is really good at playing off big emotional moments, especially big moments lots of people have lived through (like graduating high school. (Glee doesn’t have to be subtle, so neither should I)). When it takes those moments and puts it on the characters, instead of the other way around, it works so much better.

“Goodbye” doesn’t have a plot. Pretty much nothing happens. They graduate. They sing songs.  Yet the episode was moving, sad, and entrancing. It felt so momentous, because when we went through it, it felt. So. Momentous. I know when I graduated--only two years ago--I felt lost and excited, just like these crazy Glee bastards. Because the world was now in front of me, and I had no idea what to do with that. It’s terrifying. Because of the very real possibility of failure.

Failure, as I talked about before, has always been prevalent in the really good episodes of Glee. Because, think about it, these are kids who love to perform. I don’t know the actual statistics, but I’m pretty sure high school performers are less likely to “make it big” than high school athletes (which also has pretty low stats). Again, like I said last time, look at your parents. Some of them might be doing what they love. But they are few and far between. And if they are doing what they love it’s probably in the context of a basic middle-class life. (Don’t get me wrong, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a basic, middle-class life, I’m just saying: most dreams, especially teenage dreams, are a little bigger than that) So when the show even allows the possibility of this, it’s pretty successful in my eyes.

I know that on one point this show is about the “joy of performing.” But joy is boring, from a dramatically interesting standpoint. (Which is probably why I’m having a hard time writing about the funny episodes of all the wonderful sitcoms I watch) So when the show does those episodes about how much fun they’re having, it sucks. When they toss in stupid melodramatic plots to counteract that, it also sucks. When they try to have melodramatic plots about these kids confronting serious/important issues, it’s mostly a 50/50. But when the show is about these crazy Glee bastards confronting the fact that they could end up never doing what they love, staying in their hometown, working at Linens ‘N’ Things or the Lima, Ohio equivalent of Big Y, it’s often been fantastic. Or at least wonderful. Ok, at the very least, it doesn’t make me want to murder small woodland creatures.

That brings me to Rachel Berry. Now, there was no denying that Rachel was going to be the girl to get out. It’s been established since the pilot. To make her character not get into NYADA (a word I NEVER want to hear spoken again) would be to completely kill the point they were making with her character.  Rachel is talented, that’s always been made clear. But she’s also got the persistence. She harassed Whoopi Goldberg enough to get into NYADA, as only one minor example. She’s motivated, she’s driven. You can see that from all the shit in her bedroom and locker. And how every other sentence she’s said since season one has included the word “Broadway,” “New York,” or “star.”

Rachel is painfully, obnoxiously annoying. Annoying as holy hell. She’s been insufferable about her dreams. Going on and on and on and on about them. Nonstop. We all know someone (or many people) like this. Who has a goal or a dream and are constantly doing stuff to work on getting there, constantly talking about it. And it’s annoying. Irritating. Obnoxious. But the point being made is that those people annoying you with their “big dreams” and with their frequent, if not nonstop, working on them are often the people that will achieve those dreams. Don’t get me wrong, there a certainly completely delusional people out there, but there are those people we know that just seem destined to live out their dream lives. Glee reminds us that the successful people of this planet we live on, 9 times out of 10, are the Rachel Berrys. The people who talk nonstop about what it will take to become a pro-athlete or a famous actor or the president. And it’s funny. Because we admire that quality when they’re up there, giving their inauguration speeches, post-Super Bowl interviews, and Oscar speeches, but we find it immensely irritating in real life. I, for one, have a hard time deciding what to eat for breakfast, why would I want to deal with someone who knows EXACTLY where the next thirty years will take them?  

I should talk specifically about the actual episode a little, though. Most of the scenes were nice; tying up storylines about where all these characters are going. Mercedes is going to LA to be a backup singer for some indie label. Quinn is going to Yale, and she’ll be able to walk around and dance if she wants to, I guess. Santana’s got an envelope full of Gloria Estefan’s money, so she’s all set to do whatever. Will finally tells Finn how much of a creeper he was back in the pilot when he spied on him in the shower and then planted weed in his locker. (Remember??) Brittany is staying at McKinley, because she’s a moron. A loveable, good-looking, dancing, fat cat having, moron. Puck managed to graduate, which I suppose is a victory in itself. And the underclassmen will be fine until next fall, probably. And the teachers once again say goodbye to another generation of kids they’ve grown too fond of, forever sending young people off into an uncertain world.

Most of these scenes are only motivated by the fact that it’s the finale and they’re graduating. But that’s enough for it to be good, because when they move plot aside to focus on the emotional moments, it always works. Nearly always, at least. The Puck and Brittany scenes were meh for me, and I feel like they could’ve done something better with the Santana stuff. But what I was unprepared for was the Quinn/Sue goodbye scene. I didn’t expect to be affected by it, but I was. And I don’t think it was just because I enjoy both Jane Lynch and Dianna Agron.

Two other scenes stuck out for me, and I’m sure they stuck out for most people as well. First: the scene where Rachel, Kurt and Finn are opening their letters. Finn doesn’t get into the Actor’s Studio (Which makes complete sense and no one should be mad/upset/surprised about). Rachel gets into NYADA (and I repeat, makes total sense and no one should get mad about it). But Kurt doesn’t get in. They’ve normally been really good to Kurt in that he’s gone through a lot of shit but has always come out on top. So it’s sad, yes, but kind of nice that they made something bad happen to their saint character that won’t be fixed for a while. But God, that scene nailed the emotional shit, because that moment has happened to everybody. Lord knows I remember opening my BU letter, taking like two hours of trembling before clicking on the link, to see my rejection written out so plainly. And the several days after that, feeling defeated, sad, depressed. Having to change my plans (I would say dreams, to be more fitting, but I didn’t really have any).

Finn’s joining the army was a gutsy move, only because they mentioned the possibility only ONCE before, in that episode where he learns his father’s death hadn’t been as noble as he’d thought. But it makes sense that he does that instead of going out to try to become a star. Because that’s not who Finn is. He’s always just been there as the support for Rachel. He’s a loser and a lummox. He only was able to become the lead because they needed a lead and he looked the part. But that scene where Finn drives Rachel to the train station. Lea Michele and Cory Montieth kill it. They nailed it. It was great. It was great because it goes on and on and on and on, and never seems like it’s going to end, because you’re seeing a whole set of dreams disintegrating in front of these kids’ eyes, replaced by another, much more uncertain one. But that’s the way the dreams you have at 17 or 18 are. They gradually fall apart, and then you build new ones. Or maybe you get caught up in the old ones and wish for a way to go back, for a time machine you don’t have. I’ll quote Springsteen (I figure it’s appropriate because they sang Glory Days DURING the graduation ceremony, which was lame. Finn was singing as he was giving Emma a hug and accepting his diploma, smh) : Is a dream a lie if it don’t come true, or is it something worse?

Thursday, May 17, 2012

The COMMUNITY finale

Ok, I got sent to Twitter jail, and I couldn't NOT say something. Luckily I started this blog.
I'm shaking from excitement and from all the energy I exerted these past hours, so I know I won't be able to write out all my thoughts and feelings about the finale, let alone the other two episodes, let alone let alone the show as a whole.

But I just needed to say that those final scenes made me feel so many feelings. And I know I would have cried if the show didn't get renewed and that was it. I would have died. Dead. Done. Best show ever. Six seasons and a movie. I can't even make a proper sentence because I'm so damn excited and filled with emotions.

I think what I'll do when I talk about Community is go one episode at a time. Compile a list of my all-time favorites that have such powerful significance for me to talk about. I don't think I'll ever find the words to write about this season's finale, though. But I think I can do some episodes justice.